Circumstantial evidence

It’s a bit hard to tell that you’re looking at a humpback whale here, but here’s the circumstantial case:

1) The faint plume of moisture hanging above something dark on the water’s surface — thar she blew!

2) The gulls circling above, hoping for a handout

Resurrection Bay, Alaska

After we saw the flukes, the captain of our boat told us he recognized her markings and that she’s been named Tanya by the people who study the whales around there. As far as I know, the puffins bobbing in the foreground are just bystanders — I don’t think they follow the whales around like gulls do.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s